春节假期养肺补心是重点******
文/羊城晚报记者 张华 通讯员 李朝
春节前夕，广东省名中医、广东省第二中医院针灸科主任医师范德辉告诉广大读者，“阳康”后重点是恢复肺气，趁着假期可以补养心气。
刺激肺经，恢复肺气
新冠对肺脏的伤害是比较大的，所以在恢复期内一定要注意肺脏的养护。如何养护肺脏？范德辉指出，可以通过对肺经的刺激帮助排邪，养护正气。
“首先，肺经在胸前上方有两个穴位——中府与云门。这两个穴位不仅位置靠近肺部，而且还是肺经上的穴位。艾灸这两个穴位可以帮我们补充肺中的阳气，增强肺脏驱赶邪气的能力。”范德辉说。
其次，另一个重要的地方肺俞穴位。肺俞虽然不在肺经上，但也是保养肺脏的一个重要穴位，它是肺脏的专属保健穴，即出现任何肺系疾患，都可以通过按摩或艾灸肺俞来帮助解决。范德辉认为，首选艾灸的方式来刺激肺俞穴位。也可以选用贴“三九贴”的方法，利用药物的渗透来刺激这个穴位。
气阴两虚，注意补养心气
心与肺同在胸腔，二者位置接近，也可相互影响。中医认为，心脏的功能第一点是藏神明，心脏统管全身的精神、意识和思维活动。所以心气弱的人除了心慌气短之外，往往还会伴有精神不佳、思维不够灵活、睡眠不好等问题。
人体发热后一般气阴两虚，可用人参、黄芪、五指毛桃、西洋参、虫草之类炖鸡或者瘦肉，益气养阴，补充体力。范德辉介绍：“养心气比较好的药物有参类，如西洋参、人参等。西洋参药性微寒，服用不易上火。人参可大补元气，必定能补益到心气。当食用人参时，可以配合一些养心阴的麦冬、敛心液的五味子，组成经典的生脉饮，以益气生津，敛阴止汗。”
另外，专家还建议，多晒太阳。“每天上午或者下午晒太阳不少于半小时，吸纳自然界清阳之气。同时注意保暖，尤其要注意胸口部位保暖，防止寒气再次伤及心脏阳气和肺气。”
脾胃弱，兼顾运化脾胃
味觉减退、食欲不佳、腹泻等症状，说明新冠也会对脾胃造成一定的影响。如何补脾？范德辉认为，除了对足太阴脾经进行拍打、按摩以及足三里的环转揉按之外，还有食疗和运动的方法。
食疗——健脾祛湿汤。“选用山药、茯苓、莲子、芡实这四种食材加上猪肚来煲汤健脾祛湿。”范德辉还指出，“新冠的病人，大多数湿象会比较重，建议选用参苓白术散，它在健脾的同时，还可以达到祛湿的效果。”
运动锻炼——八段锦。许多人在“阳康”后便迫不及待地想做一些运动来恢复身体机能，而专家建议，不要进行剧烈运动。这时，可以选择更为平和的运动——八段锦，以疏通经脉、协调五脏六腑。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 天天彩票地图 |
